226 research outputs found

    Orientability thresholds for random hypergraphs

    Full text link
    Let h>w>0h>w>0 be two fixed integers. Let \orH be a random hypergraph whose hyperedges are all of cardinality hh. To {\em ww-orient} a hyperedge, we assign exactly ww of its vertices positive signs with respect to the hyperedge, and the rest negative. A (w,k)(w,k)-orientation of \orH consists of a ww-orientation of all hyperedges of \orH, such that each vertex receives at most kk positive signs from its incident hyperedges. When kk is large enough, we determine the threshold of the existence of a (w,k)(w,k)-orientation of a random hypergraph. The (w,k)(w,k)-orientation of hypergraphs is strongly related to a general version of the off-line load balancing problem. The graph case, when h=2h=2 and w=1w=1, was solved recently by Cain, Sanders and Wormald and independently by Fernholz and Ramachandran, which settled a conjecture of Karp and Saks.Comment: 47 pages, 1 figures, the journal version of [16

    Enumeration of graphs with a heavy-tailed degree sequence

    Full text link
    In this paper, we asymptotically enumerate graphs with a given degree sequence d=(d_1,...,d_n) satisfying restrictions designed to permit heavy-tailed sequences in the sparse case (i.e. where the average degree is rather small). Our general result requires upper bounds on functions of M_k= \sum_{i=1}^n [d_i]_k for a few small integers k\ge 1. Note that M_1 is simply the total degree of the graphs. As special cases, we asymptotically enumerate graphs with (i) degree sequences satisfying M_2=o(M_1^{ 9/8}); (ii) degree sequences following a power law with parameter gamma>5/2; (iii) power-law degree sequences that mimic independent power-law "degrees" with parameter gamma>1+\sqrt{3}\approx 2.732; (iv) degree sequences following a certain "long-tailed" power law; (v) certain bi-valued sequences. A previous result on sparse graphs by McKay and the second author applies to a wide range of degree sequences but requires Delta =o(M_1^{1/3}), where Delta is the maximum degree. Our new result applies in some cases when Delta is only barely o(M_1^ {3/5}). Case (i) above generalises a result of Janson which requires M_2=O(M_1) (and hence M_1=O(n) and Delta=O(n^{1/2})). Cases (ii) and (iii) provide the first asymptotic enumeration results applicable to degree sequences of real-world networks following a power law, for which it has been empirically observed that 2<gamma<3.Comment: 34 page

    Rainbow Hamilton cycles in random regular graphs

    Full text link
    A rainbow subgraph of an edge-coloured graph has all edges of distinct colours. A random d-regular graph with d even, and having edges coloured randomly with d/2 of each of n colours, has a rainbow Hamilton cycle with probability tending to 1 as n tends to infinity, provided d is at least 8.Comment: 16 page

    A limit theorem for the six-length of random functional graphs with a fixed degree sequence

    Full text link
    We obtain results on the limiting distribution of the six-length of a random functional graph, also called a functional digraph or random mapping, with given in-degree sequence. The six-length of a vertex v∈Vv\in V is defined from the associated mapping, f:V→Vf:V\to V, to be the maximum i∈Vi\in V such that the elements v,f(v),…,fi−1(v)v, f(v), \ldots, f^{i-1}(v) are all distinct. This has relevance to the study of algorithms for integer factorisation

    Uniform generation of random graphs with power-law degree sequences

    Full text link
    We give a linear-time algorithm that approximately uniformly generates a random simple graph with a power-law degree sequence whose exponent is at least 2.8811. While sampling graphs with power-law degree sequence of exponent at least 3 is fairly easy, and many samplers work efficiently in this case, the problem becomes dramatically more difficult when the exponent drops below 3; ours is the first provably practicable sampler for this case. We also show that with an appropriate rejection scheme, our algorithm can be tuned into an exact uniform sampler. The running time of the exact sampler is O(n^{2.107}) with high probability, and O(n^{4.081}) in expectation.Comment: 50 page
    • …
    corecore